In this episode, we dive into the "Build vs. Buy vs. Embed" dilemma. Rich Swier explains that while upgrading existing SaaS products feels safe, it is often a trap. The industry is currently pushing "AI upgrades" to preserve seat licensing, forcing a critical re-evaluation of whether these "walled gardens" actually provide enterprise value.

Laying out the three crucial strategic paths businesses can take. First, Building from scratch, which offers control but comes with heavy security and compliance burdens. Second, Embedding/Upgrading, which often provides "the worst version of AI" due to vendor cost-cutting on models. Finally, The Hybrid Approach, where companies buy a platform to handle the infrastructure but build custom agents on top to retain IP and flexibility.
This transformation is a warning for business leaders looking for a quick fix and developers stuck maintaining legacy systems. The episode warns that companies who simply "upgrade" will be stuck with inferior models and high seat costs. Your expertise must now focus on deploying autonomous agents that reduce seat dependency, rather than just adding a chatbot to a legacy interface.

10 Key Takeaways
The "Build vs. Buy" debate now includes "Embed/Upgrade" as a third, often deceptive option.
Building AI is "deceivingly simple" for demos but complex for enterprise security.
SaaS vendors use "walled gardens" to keep AI contained within their own products.
Vendors rarely use best-of-breed models (like GPT-5) because it destroys their margins.
Upgrading a SaaS product is often the "worst version of AI" you can get for the money.
Token usage is a new "currency" or COGS that businesses must account for.
The "Hybrid" strategy (Buy Platform + Build Custom) offers the best of both worlds.
Companies should look for "Zero Code" platforms that still offer API/SDK access.
AI should be viewed as an existential threat to the "per seat" business model.
Automation should eventually turn software into "systems of record" rather than active UI.

‍